A Few Points To Know About Singapore Activist Kirsten Han

Kirsten Han is usually a Singaporean activist and freelance journalist. She is active in social movements to convey about political change in Singapore and just lately bought upset with the media for portraying her as an agent of overseas interference.

Listed here are a few details about her that Singaporeans must know.

#1 She thinks she could be the saviour of oppressed Singaporeans

She cares a good deal about social movements and civil disobedience in Singapore as she thinks Singaporeans are frustrated. She at the time stated:

Loads of Singaporeans feel that it [civil Modern society in Singapore] is rather hopeless. A lot of men and women say such things as, check out what number of thousands of people they're able to get to the streets in Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur – they will have Bersih, they're able to have the Umbrella Motion. We are unable to even get 100 people in Hong Lim Park without law enforcement coming.

Individuals truly feel extremely frustrated. We can not manage to do the things that civil societies can perform in other international locations.


Being an advocate of open discussions, Kirsten Han By natural means bought indignant on the media for allegedly having her text from context and failing to recognise her make an effort to help save all of us from oppression.

She called out the MSM for quoting her in a very 2016 Discussion board: "Ms Han, on video, has said that Singapore has failed compared with Hong Kong, simply because 500,000 people don’t go around the streets to march, compared with (in) Hong Kong".

These words can be context-precise however the afterwards part of her speech will not be – she had described a social motion as not merely five hundred,000 men and women but rather, "all the work that goes into potentially someday having five hundred,000 people on the streets". With this definition, she hoped that Singapore will likely have additional of such social actions. Definitions are certainly not context-precise, appropriate? Is that this how she thinks she can "help you save" Singapore?


#two She thinks foreigners can perform an improved career at functioning Singapore

Han once in a while writes about Singapore inside the foreign press and at the time explained that Singapore is a rustic with small time for openness and human legal rights. She thinks that Singapore should really build cross-border solidarity so that you can "resist" our authoritarian govt.

On some occasions, she has satisfied or attempted to satisfy leaders of other international locations in inquiring them to carry democracy to Southeast Asia. In August previous year, she satisfied Dr Mahathir Mohamad in Malaysia with Thum Pingtjin, Jolovan Wham and Tan Wah-Piow. This 12 months, she also made an effort to meet up with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing Wen.


When the government states foreigners should not influence domestic affairs or foreigners mustn't bring their nations around the world’ politics into Singapore, we must always thrust again on that likewise simply because why not?

Sounds like she is supportive of getting foreigners deliver their politics into Singapore. If that's not overseas influence, then what is?

#three She thinks she's a defender of human legal rights by shielding drug traffickers

Kirsten Han Next Odds

Kirsten Han has voiced out repeatedly about providing drug traffickers a second likelihood. She appreciates about the crimes they may have fully commited but strongly believes they deserve Yet another shot in life. Whilst everyone is entitled for their legal rights, the marketing campaign should not entirely target the plight of drug traffickers. How about households who ended up affected by their drug misuse? Do they not have rights?

Han never highlighted the distinction amongst drug abusers and drug traffickers. Drug abusers would not have the Loss of life penalty imposed on them even though drug traffickers are people that dedicate a lot more really serious crimes by trafficking precise medicines previously mentioned certain prescribed amounts. It's important to highlight this distinction if a person hopes to campaign for 2nd prospects but she has didn't accomplish that. Does this suggest that she's taking the legislation away from context?

Singapore could have demanding guidelines but They are really for a rationale. With no these regulations, A significant port like Singapore will likely be liable to many international drug traffickers and consistently supplying them next probabilities will only give rise to A much bigger drug misuse trouble. Does one really need to check out that in Singapore? Does she stand for what you wish for?